Subject	I'll be doing this for sure! VTF! (n/m)
Posted by	DRIZCOL on October 01, 2004 at 10:05 PM
	This message has been viewed 159 times.
In Reply To	Converting Stock Fuel Lines to SS Braided Lines posted by PunkZTT(Phoenix) on October 01, 2004 at 04:44 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Converting Stock Fuel Lines to SS Braided Lines - PunkZTT(Phoenix) 16:44:18 10/01/04 Couple things >> - my91z 16:49:47 10/01/04 here ya go.. - PunkZTT(Phoenix) 16:56:23 10/01/04 bookmarked (n/m) - zspec1 16:53:00 10/01/04 yep (n/m) - ZLover4Life 19:25:26 10/01/04 Nice job, Bro. (n/m) - Mighty-Znoobie 16:56:15 10/01/04 move to Tech... VTF. (n/m) - Tu 17:12:21 10/01/04 nice (n/m) - aliaZ 17:24:01 10/01/04 awesome writeup man (n/m) - Playboy 17:33:48 10/01/04 Very nice ... one note - Guapo 17:39:47 10/01/04 nother note - dogpile 17:44:08 10/01/04 Re: nother note - Guapo 17:48:04 10/01/04 You do not want to use 45 degree flares - Chip(GMS Racing) 00:17:55 10/02/04 sounds good to me (n/m) - Guapo 12:42:23 10/02/04 wouldn't have room to use that on the lines near firewall - spotz 18:58:17 10/01/04 You could make enough room. (n/m) - Snoguitar 19:04:04 10/01/04 Good Info! Thanks for the options :) (n/m) - PunkZTT(Phoenix) 14:18:09 10/02/04 move to tech vtf (n/m) - MickieMagik(oh) 17:50:30 10/01/04 nice writeup-vtf. (n/m) - sfarrah 17:52:29 10/01/04 VTF (n/m) - TTZen 18:04:36 10/01/04 2nd (n/m) - NATHAN91'TT 19:45:36 10/01/04 Very Nice, Good Detail, VTF (n/m) - Atl300zxTT 20:35:01 10/01/04 Very nice, VTF (n/m) - DougZXNA 20:56:31 10/01/04 I'll be doing this for sure! VTF! (n/m) - DRIZCOL 22:05:28 10/01/04 Re: Converting Stock Fuel Lines to SS Braided Lines - Mitchell(AMZ Performance) 22:57:52 10/01/04 Awesome! Thanks for the detailed writeup & photos. (n/m) - phreeZin 23:19:32 10/01/04 Can you post the part # for the compression fitting please? (n/m) - yellowzxtt 00:52:23 10/02/04 I purchased my fittings from this website.... - PunkZTT(Phoenix) 14:21:30 10/02/04 Shouldn't the FPR be on the line that feeds the fuel rail? - boileralum 09:07:14 10/02/04 incorrect. It is on the return line. (n/m) - Guapo 09:28:47 10/02/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.